Talmud su I Cronache 9:22

⁹⁹This text is from Sukkah 5:8, explaining the discrimination against the Bilgah watch. One could not make them 23, as it is written¹⁰⁰1Chr. 9:22., these are the institutions of David and Samuel the Seer in their professionalism. It was a great feat of professionalism that no watch was taking and repeating in inheritance fields before the other could take¹⁰¹It is prescribed in Lev. 27:21 that real estate dedicated to the Temple by a person whose ancestor received this land in the original distribution under Joshua and which is not redeemed by the next Jubilee becomes property of the Cohanim. This is read to mean that it becomes property of the watch which regularly is on duty on the day of Atonement in the Jubilee year (Lev. 25:9). (Property bought, not inherited, must be redeemed, Lev. 27:23–24.) It now is asserted that no watch repeats serving on the Day of Atonement in a Jubilee year after less than 24 Jubilee periods (or 1200 years.) Since we have no details about the calendar rules of the First Temple period, at the end of which the rules of original distribution became moot, the statement can be neither verified nor falsified.. Rebbi Abbahu said, I computed it that no watch was taking and repeating in inheritance fields before the other could take.

¹⁶⁰Babli 56b, Tosephta 4:28.“Bilgah¹⁴⁵No. 15 in the list of Chronicles. always distributes in the South. Because of Miriam from Bilgah who apostasied and went to marry a general¹⁶¹Greek στρατιώτης. of the Greek government. She came and patted on the top of the altar and said to it, Λύκος¹⁶²“Wolf”., you destroyed Israel’s property¹⁶³Her objection was to the excessive cost of Israelite worship. (While in Deut. the worship is restricted to “the place which the Eternal will choose,” it never is said that there can only be one such place. However the cost of the service detailed in Lev. makes it clear that only one such place was there at any given time.) and did not support them at the time of their distress. But some are saying that its time arrived to serve but it did not appear; so Yeshevav¹⁶⁴The preceding watch in the list of Chr. served in its stead in the High¹⁶⁵The word “High” has to be deleted. It simply is stated that Yeshevav served for two consecutive weeks. Priesthood.” Therefore Bilgah always is with the outgoing and Yeshevav withy the incoming. Should it not have been eliminated from its place? You cannot do this, as Rebbi Simon said in the name of Rebbi Joshua ben Levi: It is hard before the Omnipresent to eliminate the chain of descent from its place. Could they not be made twenty-three? You cannot do this, as it is written¹⁶⁶1Chr. 9:22., these are the foundations of David and Samuel the Seer in their faithfulness. In their professionalism. It was a great feat of professionalism that no watch was taking and repeating in inheritance fields before the other could take¹⁶⁷It is prescribed in Lev. 27:21 that real estate dedicated to the Temple by a person whose ancestor received this land in the original distribution under Joshua and which is not redeemed by the next Jubilee becomes property of the Cohanim. This is read to mean that it becomes property of the watch which regularly is on duty on the day of Atonement in the Jubilee year (Lev. 25:9). (Property bought, not inherited, must be redeemed, Lev. 27:23–24.) It now is asserted that no watch repeats serving on the Day of Atonement in a Jubilee year after less than 24 Jubilee periods (or 1200 years.) Since we have no details about the calendar rules of the First Temple period, at the end of which the rules of original distribution became moot, the statement can be neither verified nor falsified. (There is another, most unconvincing, interpretation of this passage by Pene Moshe.). Rebbi Abbahu said, I computed it that no watch was taking and repeating in inheritance fields before the other could take.